The Fix
pip install celery==4.4.0rc5
Based on closed celery/celery issue #5439 · PR/commit linked
Production note: This usually shows up under retries/timeouts. Treat it as a side-effect risk until you can verify behavior with a canary + real traffic.
@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ class Context(object):
timelimit = None
origin = None
- task_name = None
_children = None # see property
_protected = 0
if self.app.conf.find_value_for_key('extended', 'result'):
if request:
request_meta = {
'name': getattr(request, 'task_name', None),
'args': getattr(request, 'args', None),
'kwargs': getattr(request, 'kwargs', None),
'worker': getattr(request, 'hostname', None),
'retries': getattr(request, 'retries', None),
'queue': request.delivery_info.get('routing_key')
if hasattr(request, 'delivery_info') and
request.delivery_info else None
}
meta.update(request_meta)
Re-run the minimal reproduction on your broken version, then apply the fix and re-run.
Option A — Upgrade to fixed release\npip install celery==4.4.0rc5\nWhen NOT to use: This fix should not be applied if the task's metadata is expected to remain unchanged.\n\n
Why This Fix Works in Production
- Trigger: - [x] I have included all related issues and possible duplicate issues
- Mechanism: The task name is always None when result_extended=True due to incorrect key usage in the Request object
- Why the fix works: Fixes the issue where the task name is always None when result_extended=True by using the correct key in the Request object. (first fixed release: 4.4.0rc5).
- If left unfixed, this can cause silent data inconsistencies that propagate (bad cache entries, incorrect downstream decisions).
Why This Breaks in Prod
- The task name is always None when result_extended=True due to incorrect key usage in the Request object
- Production symptom (often without a traceback): - [x] I have included all related issues and possible duplicate issues
Proof / Evidence
- GitHub issue: #5439
- Fix PR: https://github.com/celery/celery/pull/5486
- First fixed release: 4.4.0rc5
- Reproduced locally: No (not executed)
- Last verified: 2026-02-09
- Confidence: 0.75
- Did this fix it?: Yes (upstream fix exists)
- Own content ratio: 0.59
Discussion
High-signal excerpts from the issue thread (symptoms, repros, edge-cases).
“@thedrow Ouch. I swear I tested for task name and had it working with flower. I'll take a look.”
“Found: https://github.com/celery/celery/blob/master/celery/app/task.py#L95”
“@svidela thank you for the explanation, that's what I was saying, the request object has a task attribute and not a task_name, the tests pass…”
“@svidela @mdawar You are of course correct”
Failure Signature (Search String)
- - [x] I have included all related issues and possible duplicate issues
- or possible duplicates to this issue as requested by the checklist above.
Copy-friendly signature
Failure Signature
-----------------
- [x] I have included all related issues and possible duplicate issues
or possible duplicates to this issue as requested by the checklist above.
Error Message
Signature-only (no traceback captured)
Error Message
-------------
- [x] I have included all related issues and possible duplicate issues
or possible duplicates to this issue as requested by the checklist above.
Minimal Reproduction
if self.app.conf.find_value_for_key('extended', 'result'):
if request:
request_meta = {
'name': getattr(request, 'task_name', None),
'args': getattr(request, 'args', None),
'kwargs': getattr(request, 'kwargs', None),
'worker': getattr(request, 'hostname', None),
'retries': getattr(request, 'retries', None),
'queue': request.delivery_info.get('routing_key')
if hasattr(request, 'delivery_info') and
request.delivery_info else None
}
meta.update(request_meta)
What Broke
Tasks fail to report their names, leading to confusion in task tracking and management.
Why It Broke
The task name is always None when result_extended=True due to incorrect key usage in the Request object
Fix Options (Details)
Option A — Upgrade to fixed release Safe default (recommended)
pip install celery==4.4.0rc5
Use when you can deploy the upstream fix. It is usually lower-risk than long-lived workarounds.
Option D — Guard side-effects with OnceOnly Guardrail for side-effects
Mitigate duplicate external side-effects under retries/timeouts/agent loops by gating the operation before calling external systems.
- Place OnceOnly between your code/agent and real side-effects (Stripe, emails, CRM, APIs).
- Use a stable key per side-effect (e.g., customer_id + action + idempotency_key).
- Fail-safe: configure fail-open vs fail-closed based on blast radius and spend risk.
- This does NOT fix data corruption; it only prevents duplicate side-effects.
Show example snippet (optional)
from onceonly import OnceOnly
import os
once = OnceOnly(api_key=os.environ["ONCEONLY_API_KEY"], fail_open=True)
# Stable idempotency key per real side-effect.
# Use a request id / job id / webhook delivery id / Stripe event id, etc.
event_id = "evt_..." # replace
key = f"stripe:webhook:{event_id}"
res = once.check_lock(key=key, ttl=3600)
if res.duplicate:
return {"status": "already_processed"}
# Safe to execute the side-effect exactly once.
handle_event(event_id)
Fix reference: https://github.com/celery/celery/pull/5486
First fixed release: 4.4.0rc5
Last verified: 2026-02-09. Validate in your environment.
When NOT to Use This Fix
- This fix should not be applied if the task's metadata is expected to remain unchanged.
- Do not use this to hide logic bugs or data corruption. Use it to block duplicate external side-effects and enforce tool permissions/spend caps.
Verify Fix
Re-run the minimal reproduction on your broken version, then apply the fix and re-run.
Did This Fix Work in Your Case?
Quick signal helps us prioritize which fixes to verify and improve.
Prevention
- Capture the exact failing error string in logs and tests so you can reproduce via a minimal script.
- Pin production dependencies and upgrade only with a reproducible test that hits the failing path.
Version Compatibility Table
| Version | Status |
|---|---|
| 4.4.0rc5 | Fixed |
Related Issues
No related fixes found.
Sources
We don’t republish the full GitHub discussion text. Use the links above for context.