The Fix
pip install celery==5.5.0
Based on closed celery/celery issue #9431 · PR/commit linked
Production note: This usually shows up under retries/timeouts. Treat it as a side-effect risk until you can verify behavior with a canary + real traffic.
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
import os
-from django.conf import settings
-
from celery import Celery
amqp==5.3.1
asgiref==3.8.1
billiard==4.2.1
celery==5.4.0
click==8.1.7
click-didyoumean==0.3.1
click-plugins==1.1.1
click-repl==0.3.0
Django==5.1.3
kombu==5.4.2
prompt_toolkit==3.0.48
python-dateutil==2.9.0.post0
six==1.16.0
SQLAlchemy==2.0.36
sqlparse==0.5.2
typing_extensions==4.12.2
tzdata==2024.2
vine==5.1.0
wcwidth==0.2.13
Re-run: python ./manage.py shell
Option A — Upgrade to fixed release\npip install celery==5.5.0\nWhen NOT to use: Do not apply this fix if the Django example is not being used.\n\n
Why This Fix Works in Production
- Trigger: $ python ./manage.py shell
- Mechanism: The import statement for settings in the Django example was incorrect, causing the example to fail
- Why the fix works: Fixed the Django example to ensure it runs correctly by updating the import statement for settings. (first fixed release: 5.5.0).
- If left unfixed, the same config can fail only in production (env differences), causing startup failures or partial feature outages.
Why This Breaks in Prod
- The import statement for settings in the Django example was incorrect, causing the example to fail
- Surfaces as: $ python ./manage.py shell
Proof / Evidence
- GitHub issue: #9431
- Fix PR: https://github.com/celery/celery/pull/9562
- First fixed release: 5.5.0
- Reproduced locally: No (not executed)
- Last verified: 2026-02-09
- Confidence: 0.85
- Did this fix it?: Yes (upstream fix exists)
- Own content ratio: 0.63
Discussion
High-signal excerpts from the issue thread (symptoms, repros, edge-cases).
“I do not understand why the last change (#9099) was made at all”
“Hey @giovanniacg - it seems the last change (#9099) is causing some issues. Can you give it a look please?”
“> But even then the example code still fails to run. Exactly why I didn't revert it. Let's see if @giovanniacg is available to handle…”
“@auvipy any chance you can give it a look? Just try to follow the README for the Django example, step by step, and you should…”
Failure Signature (Search String)
- $ python ./manage.py shell
Error Message
Stack trace
Error Message
-------------
$ python ./manage.py shell
...
AttributeError: 'Settings' object has no attribute '__name__'. Did you mean: '__ne__'?
Minimal Reproduction
amqp==5.3.1
asgiref==3.8.1
billiard==4.2.1
celery==5.4.0
click==8.1.7
click-didyoumean==0.3.1
click-plugins==1.1.1
click-repl==0.3.0
Django==5.1.3
kombu==5.4.2
prompt_toolkit==3.0.48
python-dateutil==2.9.0.post0
six==1.16.0
SQLAlchemy==2.0.36
sqlparse==0.5.2
typing_extensions==4.12.2
tzdata==2024.2
vine==5.1.0
wcwidth==0.2.13
What Broke
The Django example fails to run, leading to confusion for users trying to follow the README.
Why It Broke
The import statement for settings in the Django example was incorrect, causing the example to fail
Fix Options (Details)
Option A — Upgrade to fixed release Safe default (recommended)
pip install celery==5.5.0
Use when you can deploy the upstream fix. It is usually lower-risk than long-lived workarounds.
Fix reference: https://github.com/celery/celery/pull/9562
First fixed release: 5.5.0
Last verified: 2026-02-09. Validate in your environment.
When NOT to Use This Fix
- Do not apply this fix if the Django example is not being used.
Verify Fix
Re-run: python ./manage.py shell
Did This Fix Work in Your Case?
Quick signal helps us prioritize which fixes to verify and improve.
Prevention
- Capture the exact failing error string in logs and tests so you can reproduce via a minimal script.
- Pin production dependencies and upgrade only with a reproducible test that hits the failing path.
Version Compatibility Table
| Version | Status |
|---|---|
| 5.5.0 | Fixed |
Related Issues
No related fixes found.
Sources
We don’t republish the full GitHub discussion text. Use the links above for context.