The Fix
pip install pydantic==2.10.5
Based on closed pydantic/pydantic issue #11203 · PR/commit linked
Production note: Most teams hit this during upgrades or environment changes. Roll out with a canary and smoke critical endpoints (health, OpenAPI/docs) before 100%.
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
import sys
from configparser import ConfigParser
-from typing import Any, Callable, Iterator
+from typing import Any, Callable, Iterator, cast
from typing import Generic, TypeVar
from pydantic import BaseModel, RootModel
T = TypeVar('T')
class Maybe(RootModel[T | None], Generic[T]):
@property
def is_some(self) -> bool:
return self.root is not None
def get(self) -> T:
assert self.root is not None
return self.root
class Test(BaseModel):
field: Maybe[int]
print(Test(field=1))
print(Test(field=None))
Re-run the minimal reproduction on your broken version, then apply the fix and re-run.
Option A — Upgrade to fixed release\npip install pydantic==2.10.5\nWhen NOT to use: This fix should not be used if the model's root type is not guaranteed to match the expected type.\n\n
Why This Fix Works in Production
- Trigger: error: Argument "field" to "Test" has incompatible type "int"; expected "Maybe[int]" [arg-type] error: Argument "field" to "Test" has incompatible type…
- Mechanism: The mypy plugin did not support initializing RootModel fields with values of the generic's type when init_typed=True
- Why the fix works: Supports initializing root model fields with values of the `root` type in the mypy plugin, addressing type compatibility issues with mypy when using `init_typed=True`. (first fixed release: 2.10.5).
- If left unfixed, the same config can fail only in production (env differences), causing startup failures or partial feature outages.
Why This Breaks in Prod
- The mypy plugin did not support initializing RootModel fields with values of the generic's type when init_typed=True
- Surfaces as: error: Argument "field" to "Test" has incompatible type "int"; expected "Maybe[int]" [arg-type]\nerror: Argument "field" to "Test" has incompatible type "None"; expected…
Proof / Evidence
- GitHub issue: #11203
- Fix PR: https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/pull/11212
- First fixed release: 2.10.5
- Reproduced locally: No (not executed)
- Last verified: 2026-02-09
- Confidence: 0.95
- Did this fix it?: Yes (upstream fix exists)
- Own content ratio: 0.66
Verified Execution
We executed the runnable minimal repro in a temporary environment and captured exit codes + logs.
- Status: PASS
- Ran: 2026-02-11T16:52:29Z
- Package: pydantic
- Fixed: 2.10.5
- Mode: fixed_only
- Outcome: ok
Logs
field=Maybe[int](root=1)
field=Maybe[int](root=None)
Discussion
High-signal excerpts from the issue thread (symptoms, repros, edge-cases).
“### Initial Checks - [X] I have searched Google & GitHub for similar requests and couldn't find anything - [X] I have read and followed the docs and still think this feature is missing ### Description Consider following code: This code runs”
Failure Signature (Search String)
- error: Argument "field" to "Test" has incompatible type "int"; expected "Maybe[int]" [arg-type]\nerror: Argument "field" to "Test" has incompatible type "None"; expected
Error Message
Stack trace
Error Message
-------------
error: Argument "field" to "Test" has incompatible type "int"; expected "Maybe[int]" [arg-type]\nerror: Argument "field" to "Test" has incompatible type "None"; expected "Maybe[int]" [arg-type]
Minimal Reproduction
from typing import Generic, TypeVar
from pydantic import BaseModel, RootModel
T = TypeVar('T')
class Maybe(RootModel[T | None], Generic[T]):
@property
def is_some(self) -> bool:
return self.root is not None
def get(self) -> T:
assert self.root is not None
return self.root
class Test(BaseModel):
field: Maybe[int]
print(Test(field=1))
print(Test(field=None))
What Broke
Mypy flags type compatibility errors when initializing RootModel fields with generic types.
Why It Broke
The mypy plugin did not support initializing RootModel fields with values of the generic's type when init_typed=True
Fix Options (Details)
Option A — Upgrade to fixed release Safe default (recommended)
pip install pydantic==2.10.5
Use when you can deploy the upstream fix. It is usually lower-risk than long-lived workarounds.
Option D — Guard side-effects with OnceOnly Guardrail for side-effects
Mitigate duplicate external side-effects under retries/timeouts/agent loops by gating the operation before calling external systems.
- Place OnceOnly between your code/agent and real side-effects (Stripe, emails, CRM, APIs).
- Use a stable key per side-effect (e.g., customer_id + action + idempotency_key).
- Fail-safe: configure fail-open vs fail-closed based on blast radius and spend risk.
Show example snippet (optional)
from onceonly import OnceOnly
import os
once = OnceOnly(api_key=os.environ["ONCEONLY_API_KEY"], fail_open=True)
# Stable idempotency key per real side-effect.
# Use a request id / job id / webhook delivery id / Stripe event id, etc.
event_id = "evt_..." # replace
key = f"stripe:webhook:{event_id}"
res = once.check_lock(key=key, ttl=3600)
if res.duplicate:
return {"status": "already_processed"}
# Safe to execute the side-effect exactly once.
handle_event(event_id)
Fix reference: https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/pull/11212
First fixed release: 2.10.5
Last verified: 2026-02-09. Validate in your environment.
When NOT to Use This Fix
- This fix should not be used if the model's root type is not guaranteed to match the expected type.
- Do not use this to hide logic bugs or data corruption. Use it to block duplicate external side-effects and enforce tool permissions/spend caps.
Verify Fix
Re-run the minimal reproduction on your broken version, then apply the fix and re-run.
Did This Fix Work in Your Case?
Quick signal helps us prioritize which fixes to verify and improve.
Prevention
- Add a CI check that diffs key outputs after upgrades (OpenAPI schema snapshots, JSON payload shapes, CLI output).
- Upgrade behind a canary and run integration tests against the canary before 100% rollout.
Version Compatibility Table
| Version | Status |
|---|---|
| 2.10.5 | Fixed |
Related Issues
No related fixes found.
Sources
We don’t republish the full GitHub discussion text. Use the links above for context.