The Fix
pip install redis==7.1.0
Based on closed redis/redis-py issue #2218 · PR/commit linked
Production note: Most teams hit this during upgrades or environment changes. Roll out with a canary and smoke critical endpoints (health, OpenAPI/docs) before 100%.
@@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ def __exit__(
def acquire(
self,
- *,
sleep: Optional[Number] = None,
blocking: Optional[bool] = None,
import redis
client = redis.Redis()
lock = client.lock('lockName')
if lock.acquire(False):
print("lock acquired!")
lock.release()
Re-run the minimal reproduction on your broken version, then apply the fix and re-run.
Option A — Upgrade to fixed release\npip install redis==7.1.0\nWhen NOT to use: This fix should not be used if the application relies on the old positional argument behavior.\n\n
Why This Fix Works in Production
- Trigger: Lock.acquire() interface change with 4.3.2
- Mechanism: Fixes backward compatibility issues introduced in versions 4.3.2 and 4.3.3 regarding the Lock.acquire() method.
- Why the fix works: Fixes backward compatibility issues introduced in versions 4.3.2 and 4.3.3 regarding the Lock.acquire() method. (first fixed release: 7.1.0).
- If left unfixed, the same config can fail only in production (env differences), causing startup failures or partial feature outages.
Why This Breaks in Prod
- Shows up under Python 3.7.15 in real deployments (not just unit tests).
- Production symptom (often without a traceback): Lock.acquire() interface change with 4.3.2
Proof / Evidence
- GitHub issue: #2218
- Fix PR: https://github.com/redis/redis-py/pull/2254
- First fixed release: 7.1.0
- Reproduced locally: No (not executed)
- Last verified: 2026-02-07
- Confidence: 0.85
- Did this fix it?: Yes (upstream fix exists)
- Own content ratio: 0.65
Discussion
High-signal excerpts from the issue thread (symptoms, repros, edge-cases).
“After submit, also referenced here: https://github.com/redis/redis-py/issues/2209#issuecomment-1145983577”
Failure Signature (Search String)
- Lock.acquire() interface change with 4.3.2
- In versions 4.3.2 and 4.3.3 the `lock.acquire(False)` gives `TypeError: acquire() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given` and forces us to use the `blocking=` keyword
Copy-friendly signature
Failure Signature
-----------------
Lock.acquire() interface change with 4.3.2
In versions 4.3.2 and 4.3.3 the `lock.acquire(False)` gives `TypeError: acquire() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given` and forces us to use the `blocking=` keyword arguments.
Error Message
Signature-only (no traceback captured)
Error Message
-------------
Lock.acquire() interface change with 4.3.2
In versions 4.3.2 and 4.3.3 the `lock.acquire(False)` gives `TypeError: acquire() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given` and forces us to use the `blocking=` keyword arguments.
Minimal Reproduction
import redis
client = redis.Redis()
lock = client.lock('lockName')
if lock.acquire(False):
print("lock acquired!")
lock.release()
Environment
- Python: 3.7.15
What Broke
TypeErrors occurred during non-blocking lock acquisition, causing application failures.
Fix Options (Details)
Option A — Upgrade to fixed release Safe default (recommended)
pip install redis==7.1.0
Use when you can deploy the upstream fix. It is usually lower-risk than long-lived workarounds.
Fix reference: https://github.com/redis/redis-py/pull/2254
First fixed release: 7.1.0
Last verified: 2026-02-07. Validate in your environment.
When NOT to Use This Fix
- This fix should not be used if the application relies on the old positional argument behavior.
Verify Fix
Re-run the minimal reproduction on your broken version, then apply the fix and re-run.
Did This Fix Work in Your Case?
Quick signal helps us prioritize which fixes to verify and improve.
Prevention
- Add a stress test that runs high-concurrency workloads and fails on thread dumps / blocked locks.
- Enable watchdog dumps in prod (faulthandler, thread dump endpoint) to capture deadlocks quickly.
Version Compatibility Table
| Version | Status |
|---|---|
| 7.1.0 | Fixed |
Related Issues
No related fixes found.
Sources
We don’t republish the full GitHub discussion text. Use the links above for context.